What is the purpose of the "Other media attention" subsection? That information can be easily merged into other sections.
There's some trivia going around, with the "Internet attacks" subsection looking like a list of every time the website makes the news.The History section is not in chronological order, since it reverts back to 2008-2010 in the Poole subsection.There are several short subsections that either need to be expanded or merged into broader subsections/topics, for instance in the "ISP bans" section.The article feels dated, as the bulk of the sources are dated before 2012 - were there any changes to the way the website operates or its features?.There's an over reliance on sources closely related to the subject.From a quick scan of Google Scholar, I can spot several well-cited academic works that are not being used here. c) of the Wikipedia:Featured article criteria, since it isn't "a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature". This is an older Featured Article that has not been reviewed since its promotion in 2008. Please read recent comments and look in the archives before commenting.Īs part of the ongoing project WP:URFA/2020, that aims to identify and draw attention to older Featured Articles that may not meet the current Featured Article criteria, I'm leaving this brief review of the article. Wikipedia does not accept original research if you believe something to be true, you must be able to prove it.ĭiscussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. All additions to the article require reliable sources for verification. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. This is not a forum for general discussion of 4chan. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. Content must be written from a neutral point of view.
#4chan sleepytime chicken free#
Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute.
Spoken Wikipedia Wikipedia:WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia Template:WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia Spoken Wikipedia articles If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that are spoken on Wikipedia. See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention.Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?) Try to get YouTube to FA Tag all articles you find with.Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images.Expand : Pick an article from here or here.Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles.This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. Websites Wikipedia:WikiProject Websites Template:WikiProject Websites Websites articles To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page. This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. This article has been rated as B-Class by the WikiProject Vital Articles. This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:Ĥchan has been listed as a level-5 vital article in Society. This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on January 14, 2009. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed. Provided the awareness criteria are met, discretionary sanctions may be used against editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process.Ĥchan is a former featured article. The Arbitration Committee has authorized uninvolved administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on users who edit pages related to gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them, including this article.
0 kommentar(er)
